Comparison
AEROCERT vs Foundation Models or AI Wrappers
| Feature / Criteria | Generic Foundation AI Model | Aerocert |
|---|---|---|
| Confidentiality | Risk of Data Compromise | Built for sensitive information based on private RAG |
| Domain Assurance | Not trained for the aviation sector | Trained on aviation standards using real project data |
| AI-Human Interface | Generic UI/UX | Tailored with aviation experts to prevent deskilling & enhance correct use |
| PLM Integration | Complex & difficult (requires dedicated effort & poses privacy risks) | Seamless integration with existing workflows |
| Continuous Learning | Static; lacks domain knowledge updates | Dynamic RAG continuous learning on company data updates |
| Contextual Memory | Limited / Not effective long-term memory | Maintains dynamic operator profiles (preferences, past outcomes, facts) |
| Configuration Control | Unannounced version changes & updates | Predictable, controlled, and agreed-upon upgrades |
| Risk Profile | High AI risks: data breaches, operator deskilling, biases & errors | Mitigated risks by design: Safe AI adoption for proprietary workflows |
